Email this article 
Post a Comment 
Technology and entrepreneurial orientation at the organisational level in the Johannesburg area
Abstract
Research purpose: This study examines entrepreneurship and its relation with technology, which is often conceptualised as entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and technology orientation (TO). The study is further contextualised by measuring environmental dynamism and hostility.
Motivation for the study: Despite the weight of positive empirical findings and observations that EO and TO are strategic imperatives, there is a danger that firms in Africa are lagging behind and subsequently a study of this nature aids in understanding these imperatives.
Research design, approach and method: A survey is used to collect data from a population of diverse businesses in the Johannesburg area (n = 1600), yielding a sample of 236 firms. Instruments were subjected to principal component factor analysis and descriptive statistics were calculated. The hypotheses were tested using correlational analysis, with their significance reported in terms of Pearson correlation coefficients.
Main finding: Findings reveal significant correlations between EO and environment hostility and dynamism, but not between EO and TO.
Practical and managerial implications: The study offers some solutions towards understanding how TO and EO may promote firm innovation, which encourages the diffusion, adoption and application of the very latest technologies. This is particularly relevant in cases where a lot of potential exists in developing countries to ‘import and adapt’ technologies developed in industrialised countries.
Contribution of study: Research on firm innovation in the African context may be considered valuable, as very few empirical studies that have been conducted previously focus on innovation and technology in the context of an emerging country.
How to cite this article: Urban, B. (2010). Technology and entrepreneurial orientation at the organisational level in the Johannesburg area. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 8(1), Art. #212, 9 pages. DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v8i1.212References
Allen, K., & Stearns, T. (2004). Technology entrepreneurs. In W.B. Gartner, K.G. Shaver, N.M. Carter & P.D. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics. The process of business creation (pp. 438–447). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aloulou, W., & Faylolle, A. (2005). A conceptual approach of entrepreneurial orientation within small business context. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13, 21–45.
Anastasia, A., & Urbani, S. (1997). Psychological testing. (7th edn.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Antoncic, B. (2006). Impacts of diversification and corporate entrepreneurship strategy making on growth and profitability: A normative model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 14, 49–63.
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R.D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 495–527.
Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. (2005, 14 November). Promoting technopreneurship.
Autio, E. (2005). Report on high-expectancy entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report. Babson: HEC Lausanne.
Bhuian, S.N., Menguc, B., & Bell, S.J. (2005). Just entrepreneurial enough: The moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 9–17.
Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2007). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Executive Report. London: London Business School.
Brown, T., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). An operalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 953–968.
Chen, J., He, Y.B., & Jin, X. (2008). A study on the factors that influence the fitness between technology strategy and corporate strategy. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 5, 81–103.
Cohen, L., & Holliday, M. (1998). Practical statistics for students. London: Paul Chapman.
Cooper, R.D., & Emory, C.W. (1995). Business research methods. (5th edn.). Chicago: Irwin.
Conway, C. (2008). Nanotechnology and biotechnology futures. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 19, 69–70.
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic planning of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75−87.
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 7−26.
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1997). High growth transitions: Theoretical perspectives and suggested directions. In D.L. Sexton, & R.W. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000 (pp. 99–126). Chicago: Kaplan Publishing.
Covin, J.G., Green, K.M., & Slevin, D.P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 57−81.
Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. International studies in entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.
Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environment. Administrative Staff Quarterly, 29, 52–73.
Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J., & Lane, P.J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 351–378.
Dorf, R.C., & Byers, T.H. (2008). New technology ventures. (2nd edn.). Boston: McGraw–Hill.
Drucker, P. (1979). The practice of management. London: Pan Books.
Fiet, J.O., Norton, B., & Clouse, V. (2002). A test model of discovery by technically trained employees. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research XVII-SI. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
Foba, T.W.L., & De Villiers, D. (2007). The integration of intrapreneurship into a performance management model. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 1–8.
Foo, C., & Foo, C. (2000). Socialisation of technopreneurism: Towards symbiosis in corporate innovation and technology strategy. Technovation, 20, 551–663.
Galbraith, C.S., Rodriquez, C.L., & Denoble, A.F. (2008). SME competitive strategy and location behaviour: An exploratory study of high-technology manufacturing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 183–202.
Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G., Carter, N.M., & Reynolds, P.D. (2004). Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: the process of business creation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goel, S., Gonzalez-Moreno A., & Saez-Martines, F.J. (2003). Performance implications of co-alignment of business and technological innovation strategy. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4, 213–224.
Guan, J., & Liu, J. (2007). Integrated innovations between technology and organisation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 4, 415–432.
Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hornsby, S.J., Kuratko, D.F., & Zahra, S.A. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 253–273.
Jantunen, A.K., Puumalainen, S., Saarenketo, S., & Kylaheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3, 223–243.
Khandwalla, P.N. (1977). The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt.
Knight, G.A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 213–225.
Kourilsky, M.L., & Walstad, W.B. (2002). The early environment and schooling experiences of high-technology entrepreneurs: Insights for entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1, 87–106.
Kreiser, P.M., Marino, L.D., & Weaver, M.K. (2002). Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multi country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (Spring), 71–94.
Kuratko, D.F. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship. Mason, OH: Harcourt College Publishers.
Kuratko, D.F., & Audretsch, D.B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 1–17.
Kuratko, D.F., Ireland, R.D., & Hornsby, J.S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management, 15, 60–71.
Lee, C., Lee, K., & Penning, J.M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 615–640.
Lee, S.H., & Wong, P.K. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions: A career anchor perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 7–28.
Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–166.
Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.
McGuigan, M., & Henderson, J. (2005). Organizational strategic innovation: How is government policy helping? International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2, 197–215.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1983). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25.
Minniti, M., Bygrave, W.D., & Autio, E. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Executive Report 2005. London: London School of Economics.
Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., & Covin, J.G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation. Cincinnati: Thomson/Southwestern.
Myers, S., & Marquis, D.G. (1969). Successful industrial innovation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Nkosi, T.J., & Roodt, G. (2004). An assessment of bias and fairness of the culture assessment instrument. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 2, 24–36.
Park, S., & Bae, Z.T. (2004). New venture strategies in a developing country: Identifying a typology and examining growth patterns through case studies. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 81–105.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
Pownall, I., & Lawson, V. (2005). A regional entrepreneurial orientation (REO) model for a northern English town. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13, 295–331.
Rwigema, H., Urban, B., & Venter, R. (2008). Entrepreneurship theory in practice. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Schindehutte, M., Morris, M.H., & Kocak, A. (2008). Understanding market-driving behavior: The role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 4–26.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shrader, R., & Siegel, D.S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 893–909.
Stevenson, H.H. (1983). A perspective on entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 9, 384–131.
Tang, L., & Koveos, P.E. (2004). Venture entrepreneurship, innovation entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9, 161–171.
Ulijn, J., Nagel, A., & Liang, T.W. (2001). The impact of national, corporate and professional cultures on innovation: German and Dutch firms compared. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 9(1), 21–52.
Urban, B. (2008). Entrepreneurship orientation in a developing country context: Juxtapositions with South Africa’s Innovation Index. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 425–443.
Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Rothmann, S. (2004). Assessment in multicultural groups: The South African case. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 1–7.
Venkataraman, S. (2003). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19,153–167.
Von Broembsen, M., Wood, E., & Herrington, M. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, South African Report 2005. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business.
Wang, C.L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4) 635–656.
Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, 37–50.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1307–1314.
Wong, W.K., Cheung, H.M., & Venuvinod, P.K. (2005). Individual entrepreneurial characteristics and entrepreneurial success potential. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 3, 277–292.
Zahra, S. (1993). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour: A critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 5–21.
Zahra, S.A., & Covin, J.G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship- performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.
Zahra, S.A., & Bogner, W.C. (1999). Technology and software new ventures performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 135–173.
Full Text: PDF (308KB) HTML XML
